Provision of company secretarial services to the Board and Board Committees.

Gauteng Gambling Board Complaints Complaint
Gauteng Gambling Board Complaints Against
Gauteng Gambling Board Complaints Bbb
Gauteng Gambling Board Complaints Better Business Bureau

The Gauteng Gambling Board is a statutory body established in terms of Section 3 of the Gauteng Gambling Act, No 4 of 1995, as amended (the Act). The Board falls under the definition of “provincial public entity” in terms of Section 1 of the Public Finance Management Act, No 1 of 1999 (“PFMA”), and is listed in Schedule 3 to.

The Gauteng Gambling Board is responsible for about R1.2bn in revenue derived from taxes and levies from gambling activities in the province.
Phumelela Gaming and Leisure is to challenge the Public Protector's report on her probe into the corporatisation of the horseracing industry in Gauteng, saying her findings have caused it to.

Provision of marketing and communications support services.

Ensures accuracy of gaming revenue paid by the licensees.
Ensures licensees comply with applicable gaming legislation.
Conducts regular revenue and compliance audits.
Monitors and ensures compliance with BBBEE and FIC Legislation.
Conducts FIC inspections on licensees.

Provides financial and administrative support services.

Ensures technical compliance of gaming devices to legislation.

Develops, maintains and supports management information systems.

Renders legal services to the Board and all internal business units.
* Manages litigation on behalf of the Board.
* Reviews and amends gambling legislation.
* Receives requests in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) and promotion of administrative justice act (PAJA).
* Investigate non-compliance allegations by licensees.
* Investigate disputes and complaints from the public against licensees.
* Assist law enforcement agencies in the eradication of illegal gambling

Receives and processes applications in terms of the Gauteng Gambling Act, no 4 of 1995, as amended for the following:
* Gambling facilities
* Employee registrations
* Equipment registration
* Manufacturers, suppliers and maintenance providers
* Amusement facilities
* Third party suitability

Promotes and maintains industrial relations through:
* Talent development and performance management.
* Talent planning, organizational development and central resourcing.
* Employee rewards and benefits.
* Payroll and policy development.
* Employee relations and transformation.
* Employee wellness.
* Human resource information management systems.

Identifies and implements public awareness programs aimed at promoting responsible gambling.
* Identifies socio-economic development initiatives on behalf of the Board
Receives applications for Sports Development Funding and CSI Funding.

125 Corlett Drive,
Johannesburg, 2018
South Africa.

Phone : (011) 581 4800
Fax : (011) 581 4903

Email: info@ggb.org.za

You are here:SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2016 >> [2016] ZAGPPHC 482 | Noteup | LawCite

Vukani Gaming Gauteng (Pty) Ltd and Others v KKK Properties CC and Others (87975/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 482 (21 June 2016)

Download original files

REPUBLICOF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

CASE NO: 87975/2015

DATE: 21/6/2016

Not reportable

Not of interest to other judges

Revised.

In the matter between

VUKANI GAMING GAUTENG (PTY) LTD FIRSTAPPLICANT

DIE WATERGAT KROEG CC SECONDAPPLICANT

2 GREEKS AND A BOERTJIE INVESTMENTS CC THIRDAPPLICANT

and

KKK PROPERTIES CC FIRSTRESPONDENT

ROYAL INTERNET CAFÉ SECONDRESPONDENT

THE GAUTENG GAMING BOARD THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

MADIMA, AJ

[1]. The applicants seek to interdict the first respondent from permitting the use of its premises by the second respondent forthe purpose of unlawful gambling activities. Similarly an order interdicting the second respondent from conducting, permittingor allowing the unlawful gambling activities on the premises.

[2]. The premises, situated in the Northdale Shopping Centre in Akasia, Pretoria are owned by the first respondent, and occupiedby the second respondent, as the tenant.

[3]. The first applicant is Vukani Gaming Gauteng (PTY) LTD (“Vukani”). It is the holder of a route operator licencefor the province of Gauteng. The license allows Vukani to offer for play 1 000 Limited Payout Machines (“LPMs”)in Gauteng province and at sites approved and licensed by the third respondent.

[4]. The second applicant is Die Watergat Kroeg CC (“Die Kroeg”) and conducts the business of a pub from its premisessituate at Eeufees Street in Pretoria North. Die Kroeg is licensed by Vukani for five LPMs in respect of the Eeufees Street premises.

[5]. The third applicant is 2 Greeks and a Boertjie Investments CC (“2 Greeks”) and conducts business as The New MaroelaHotel in Pretoria North. 2 Greeks is also licensed by Vukani for five LPMs from its premises.

[6]. The first respondent is KKK Properties CC (“KKK Properties”), and the owner of the Northdale premises. KKK propertieshas not been licenced by the third respondent. The second respondent is Royal Internet Café (“the Royal”), andprovides internet services from the Northdale premises. It also has not been licenced by the third respondent. The third respondentis the Gauteng Gambling Board (“the Board”) established by section 3 of the Gauteng Act 4 of 1995. No relief is soughtagainst the third respondent, however it is cited herein in so far as it may have an interest in the outcome of this application.

[7]. This matter was first brought out of this Court as an urgent application on 6 November 2015. The applicants sought inter alia a rule nisi against the first and second respondent pending finalization of the application on the return date. The first and second respondentfiled their answering papers on 27 November 2015. On 1 December 2015 the application was struck off the roll for lack of urgency.

[8]. The matter came before me on 16 May 2016. In their heads of argument the first and second respondent raise in their submissioncertain preliminary objections that I find no longer relevant. These objections relate to condonation or lack thereof for the filingof heads of argument as well as the lack of a notice of withdrawal as attorneys of record by the applicant’s erstwhile attorne

Gauteng Gambling Board Complaints